Monday, June 19, 2017

WHO IS "ONEL5969"?

I am writing every month about some of the Wikipedia users & admins who are damaging this wonderful encyclopedia. My hope is that with my denounce these "bad" persons will stop -or will be stopped- soon or later.  I know it is very difficult this task, but at least I try......however some of my friends gave me congratulations because the "Mafioso-ducetto" Vituzzu (boss in the Italian Wikipedia, to whom I dedicated my first issues in February of "MYBESTARTICLES") is angry against me in some Italian IRC discussions: evidently I have hit him very hard....

This month of July I am going to do a research about an en.wikipedia user nicknamed "Onel5969".

His name has no importance (I respect privacy; however it can be found easily in his first "user pages" of 2014 - even if he started writing on Wikipedia in 2009 and this huge gap is a bit "strange"). Onel5969 wrote that he was born in New York city in 1959. Indeed he has done more than 130000 posts and is "autoreviewer, extended-confirmed, patroller, reviewer, rollbacker" in the en.wikipedia. In other wikipedias he has no significative contributions, with the exception of "Commons".

I don't think he is like admin Doug Weller, who is the typical "Iamalwaysright" Wikipedia sysop, but they have some characteristics that are similar. For example Onel5969 states that he is "interested in History" and likes to drink (beers & wines), like Doug Weller likes archaeology and has problems of alcoholism. But what is more similar is that they both behave like "grumpy old men" against the persons who disagree with them in Wikipedia articles.

Let me explain better, denouncing what has happened between me and this user Onel5969.

What made me upset was this request of semi-protection of the article "Italian Mare Nostrum" by Onel5969, that was absolutely not needed:
           -------------------------------------------------------

Italian Mare Nostrum

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Slow, persistent reverts attempting to disregard consensus of merge discussion. Onel5969 TT me 12:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
--------------------------------------------------------



I was having a normal discussion with Onel5969 about the tricky cancellation of the article "Italian Mare Nostrum" by a
group of nationalists from former Jugoslavia.....and suddenly this Onel5969 started erasing all the article. It looked to me like he was upset because he was "connected/related" in some way to this group....
It is a group  (made by Director, Zenanarth, Zoupan, Srnec,  Joy , Kubura and others slavs, who defend dictator Tito and his Jugoslavia in the articles of en.wiki) famous for his hate toward Italy and that continuously erase  every references to the historical presence of Italian people in the Dalmatia & Istria regions.





I add now the conversation -quickly erased by Oneil5969- that I have had with him in his talk page...but why he erased all this? The only explanation is that he is "connected" to this group of leftist Marxists!!!

Here it is the conversation on his talk page:



------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Decision on "Italian Mare Nostrum"

Final decision: The final decision was to Keep
I have read in detail all the initial discussion to KEEP, and the following 2 discussion to merge and that had no result at all. How is it possible that just after one week that an article was allowed by discussion to be kept, suddenly are allowed to be done 2 additional requests to merge? So, why was done the first initial discussion that maintained the article? This looks like a tricky way to impose the wish of a NOTORIOUS group of yugoslavian users (from Director, to Zenanarh, to AlasdairGreen27, to Zoupan, to Joy, etc..), who have received harsh critics from the same Jimbo Wales (I can add data about these critics, if you want)! They hate Italy and do whatever they can to erase all that shows some good italian results in WW2......But what strikes me more is that this group gets the merge without any approval at all! Let's remember that the ONLY approval votation was the first, when was clearly stated that the result was KEEP....and finally, what is wrong with the article? The same translated version is in the Spanish Wikipedia and it is accepted without problems: consequently I have reverted for the last time (anyway, do whatever you wish in future, but remember that this group is doing huge falsifications in Wikipedia as can be read in the June issue of "il mio weblog aromuno": http://brunodam.blog.kataweb.it/2017/06/02/le-vergognose-falsificazioni-di-wikipedia/)........honestly, B. (17.255.244.17 (talk)
Honestly, B... please learn to sign your posts. As I said, the AfD result was to keep, but even in that AfD discussion there was an undercurrent to merge. The TWO following discussions regarding merging both resulted in a merge decision. Accept consensus, move on. Onel5969 TT me 21:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
At this point, your edits are becoming disruptive, as you are refusing to abide by consensus. As a result of this discussion, the consensus was clearly to merge. Which has been done. Onel5969 TT me 21:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Please, don't rush with your decisions. A Croatian group (that has received a lot of critics even from the same founder-owner of Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales/Jimbo; read: Jimbo_Wales/Archive_144#Gathering_information_about_alleged_irregularities_on_Croatian_Wikipedia and 2013_issues_on_Croatian_Wikipedia) is responsible with MEATPUPPETRY of the two merger proposals. I accept REAL AND VOTED consensus, not the one imposed by tricky meatpuppetry. Read for example the article "Josiph Broz Tito" that they shamefully control: not one single word is allowed in the article about the hundred of thousands of deaths that academics in their books clearly write that this dictator has done. Honestly, B. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 17.255.244.17 (talk) 21:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
And finally allow me to pinpoint that in "Talk:Italian Mare Nostrum/Archive 4|this discussion" on merge THERE IT IS NO OPPOSITION AT ALL, in perfect stalinist/titoist style...17.255.244.17 (talk) 22:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Reverted again Onel5969 TT me
Now I understand who you are: I am researching about you and writing the findings in my 'MYBESTARTICLES' issue for July ( " mynewbestarticles.blogspot.com/ "). You remember me those Stalinist who accused to be 'crazy' those who did not agree with them: SHAME ON YOU!17.255.244.17 (talk) 23:48, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
------------------------------------------------------------------

Now I am searching the "connection/relations/contacts" between Onel5969 and the group of Tito supporters (Director, Zenanarh, Zoupan, Srnec, Joy, Kubura, etc...), that will explain the "strange" sudden erase of the article with the comments ........


1 comment: